https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02718-3
Regular Article
Investigating the dynamical models of cosmology with recent observations and upcoming gravitational-wave data
1
Gravitational Wave and Cosmology Laboratory, Department of Astronomy, Beijing Normal University, 100875, Beijing, China
2
Key Laboratory for Computational Astrophysics, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, China
3
College of Astronomy and Space Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
4
School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, 430072, Wuhan, China
b
chenyun@bao.ac.cn
d
zhuzh@bnu.edu.cn
Received:
19
January
2022
Accepted:
12
April
2022
Published online:
25
April
2022
We explore and compare the capabilities of the recent observations of standard cosmological probes and the future observations of gravitational-wave (GW) standard sirens on constraining cosmological parameters. It is carried out in the frameworks of two typical dynamical models of cosmology, i.e., the CDM model with
, and the
-index model with
, where
is the dark energy equation of state, and
and
are the energy densities of dark energy and matter, respectively. In the cosmological analysis, the employed data sets include the recent observations of the standard cosmological probes, i.e., Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and cosmic microwave background (CMB), and also the mock GW standard siren sample with 1000 merging neutron star events anticipated from the third-generation detectors. In the scenarios of both
CDM and
-index models, it turns out that the mock GW sample can reduce the uncertainty of the Hubble constant
by about 50% relative to that from the joint SNe+BAO+CMB sample; nevertheless, the SNe+BAO+CMB sample demonstrates better performance on limiting other parameters. Furthermore, the Bayesian evidence is applied to compare the dynamical models with the
CDM model. The Bayesian evidences computed from the SNe+BAO+CMB sample reveal that the
CDM model is the most supported one; moreover, the
CDM model is more competitive than the
-index model.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Fisica and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2022